996 or Bust
996 is all the rage. You work 9 am to 9 pm, 6 days a week. Startups are doing it. Might non-startups start doing it?
Productivity is important and competition is severe. And I’m all for working hard, but I don’t think the 996 schedule is the most effective way to achieve productivity goals, at least not for all jobs.
My decision-making capabilities diminish when I am tired, and I would be tired if I worked a 996 schedule. My interpersonal and organizational effectiveness would suffer if I worked 996. My planning skills would degrade if I worked 996. My family life would suffer if I worked 996. And my physical and mental health would degrade..
In my work, I make many decisions, I create conditions for teams and organizations to do new work, and I contemplate the future and figure out what to do next. Maybe I should be able to do this work well with a 996 schedule. But I know myself, and I know I would be far less effective working 996. Maybe my work is uniquely unfit for 996? Maybe I am uniquely unfit for 996?
Some questions for you:
- How many hours can you concentrate in one day?
- How about the second day?
- If you worked a 996 schedule, would you get more done?
- How many weeks could you work 996 before the wheels fall off?
The startup pace is rapid. Progress must be made before the money runs out. At these early stages, when a company’s existence depends on hitting the super agressive timelines, I think 996 is especially attractive to startup companies The potential financial upside is large which may make for a fair trade – more hours for the chance of outsized compensation.
But what if an established company sets extremely tight timelines and offers remarkable compensation if those timelines are met? Does 996 become viable? What if an established company sets startup-like timelines but without added compensation? Would 996 be viable in that case?
Some countries and regions work a 996 schedule as a matter of course – no limited to startups and (likely) no special compensation. And it seems to work for them, at least from the outside. And 996 may be an important supporting element of their impressively low costs, high quality, and speed.
If those countries amd regions can sustain their 996 culture, and I think they will, it will create pressure on other countries to adopt a similar approach to avoid falling further behind.
I’m unsure what broad adoption of 996 would mean for the world.
Image credit — Evan